Toronto’s Safe Injection Sites Set to Close: A Community Divided

By Gabriel Meissner

Gabriel is a Community Journalist at Focus Media Arts Centre

Premier Doug Ford’s government has announced plans to close 10 of Ontario’s 23 supervised drug consumption sites by March 2025, targeting those located near schools and childcare centers. Ford asserts that the closures are necessary to protect children from exposure to drug use and the potential dangers of discarded needles in public spaces. Additionally, he argues that these sites have not demonstrated a significant impact on improving addiction outcomes and may contribute to issues in surrounding neighbourhoods. As an alternative, the government will introduce 19 new Homelessness and Addiction Recovery Treatment (HART) hubs, which aim to provide a broader spectrum of addiction and homelessness services but will not include supervised drug consumption.

The government’s decision has sparked widespread debate, with public health advocates, community leaders, and harm reduction workers voicing concerns over the potential consequences. Many experts argue that supervised consumption sites play a critical role in reducing overdoses, preventing the spread of infectious diseases, and connecting people with healthcare and addiction treatment services. The closures, they fear, will push drug use back into unsafe and unsupervised environments, increasing the risk of overdose deaths and public health crises.

In this Regent Park TV video, we delve into the impact of these impending closures on communities like Regent Park, which has long grappled with addiction, homelessness, and public health challenges. The video features street interviews with downtown residents, highlighting firsthand perspectives on how these sites have affected their neighbourhoods. Many residents express concerns that without these services, people who rely on them will be left without safer alternatives, leading to more public drug use and overdoses.

We also speak with Consumption and Treatment Service (CTS) workers who provide harm reduction services at these sites. They emphasize the importance of supervised consumption spaces as part of a comprehensive public health strategy, noting that these sites do more than provide a safe space to use drugs—they connect individuals with critical medical and social services that can help them stabilize their lives. For many, supervised consumption sites are an entry point to healthcare, housing support, and addiction treatment programs. Workers stress that removing these sites without adequate replacements will disrupt established networks of care and force people into more precarious situations.

MPP Kristyn Wong-Tam, a vocal advocate for harm reduction, also provides insight into the broader implications of these closures. They challenge the government's reasoning, arguing that supervised consumption sites have been effective in saving lives and reducing strain on emergency medical services. Wong-Tam highlights research showing that these sites reduce fatal overdoses, lower rates of public drug use, and improve connections to long-term treatment. They caution that eliminating these services without strong, evidence-based alternatives could exacerbate the opioid crisis and lead to an increase in preventable deaths.

As this debate unfolds, questions remain about how best to balance public safety with the urgent need for harm reduction and addiction treatment. While the Ford government promotes HART hubs as a solution, critics argue that without supervised consumption, these new centers may not adequately serve those most at risk. The uncertainty surrounding these changes has left many wondering whether Ontario is moving forward with a strategy that prioritizes public health or one that risks worsening an already dire crisis.

With overdose deaths continuing to rise across the province, the decision to close these sites comes at a critical time. Communities, healthcare workers, and policymakers must now navigate the complex realities of addiction treatment and public safety, weighing the evidence and lived experiences of those affected. As Ontario prepares for these closures, the future of harm reduction and addiction services remains uncertain, and the lives of many vulnerable individuals hang in the balance.